2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Radiation Chemistry
Ionizing ra diation produces abundant secondary electrons that rapidly sl ow down (thermali z e) to energ i es below 7.4 eV , the threshold to produce electronic transitions in liquid water.
For bot h t h e primary charged particle a nd the secondary electrons, this sl owing down proc ess is accom p lished by transfer of energy to the m e dium in a sequence of discrete ev ents .
Stopping power (-dE/dx) treats the slowing down process as a c ontinuous function, sometim e s referred to as the continuous slowing down approximation.
Depending on the am ount of energy transferre d to the electron, the m o lecule can undergo:
Ionization (threshol d in water ~ 13 eV)
excitation (threshol d in water ~ 7.4 eV)
thermal transfer
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
The example shown is for 20 keV electrons.
[Thermal transfers (vibration, rotation, tran slation) a r e largely inconsequential. A dose of 10 4 Gy would be necessary before the thermal effects (a few degrees centigrade) became large enough to affect cellular biochem i stry.]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Initial Physical Events
The initial event is the transfer of ~ 7 - 100 e V, an am ount of energy sufficient to cause (m ultiple) ioniz a tions or exc itations in water molecules.
Transfer of energy to the medium in biological syste m s usually involves i onization of a wa t e r molecule, but can al so involve th e cellular macro m olecules (e.g., DNA) directly.
Through i onizations and excitations the passage of a charged particle through biological mediu m creat es three speci es i n the local vicinity of the particle track :
Direct ionization of water produces a rad i cal ion and a free subexcitation electron (E < 7.4 eV).
H 2 O
r ad
H 2 O· + + e¯
Energy transfer can produce a water molecule in an excited st ate.
H 2 O
r ad
H 2 O*
The ti me s cal e for the cr eation of these speci es is on the order of 10 -16 seconds .
Prechemical Reactions
The three initial species begin to diffuse and react with each other or ot her m o lecules in the m e d i um .
Som e of these reactions produce radicals.
Radical refers to an atom or molecule that contains an unpaired electron.
Radicals are highly reactive.
Radicals can be neutral or charged.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
The electron is captured by water through dipolar interactions, becom i ng solvated, and referred to as an aqueous electron or a solvated electron:
e
aq
e¯ + H 2 O
surrounde d by a “cage” of water;
e¯ + H + H· or it can react with H + to form a radical.
The radical ion of water can dissociat e to produce a hydroxyl radical and a hydrogen i on.
H 2 O· + H + + HO·
The exci ted wat e r mol ecule can dissipate excess energy by bond breakage to produce hydroxyl and hydrogen radicals.
H 2 O* HO· + H·
It takes ~ 5 eV to break the O-H bond.
Exam ple of the dissociation of excited water to form hydroxyl and hydrogen radicals (from Tubiana, 1990).
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
The actual concentrations of the radicals are very s m all, especially when co mpared to the concentrations of ions pres ent from the dissociation of wat e r.
Thus, the three initial species :
H 2 O * , H 2 O· + and e¯,
react further to produce chemi c ally reactive species :
e
,
aq
HO·, H · , and
Water radiolysis produces highly reactive HO· and H· radicals.
These r a dicals are m u ch m o re reactive than HO¯ or H + from ionic dissociation. HO· is a powerful oxidizing ag ent, very reactive ch em ically.
Oxidation: the loss of electrons. The el ectrons are transferred to the oxidizing agent, whi c h beco mes reduced.
Reduction: the addition of electrons. May involve the addition of electron only, or the addition of hydroge n together with an electron.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Chemical Stage
After ~10 -12 sec, the chem ically r eactive species are still locat ed in the vicinity of the origina l H 2 O * , H 2 O· + and e¯ species t h at caus e d their creation.
e
.
aq
Three of t h e new speci es creat e d are radicals: HO·, H·,
These species now begin to migrate randomly about their initial positions. As this diffusion proceeds, individual pa irs may co m e close enough together to react with each other.
A variety of reactions are possible in the track of the charged p a rticle.
e
HO· + HO· H 2 O 2
HO· +
OH
e
aq
HO· + H· H 2 O
H + +
H·
aq
e + e
+ 2 H O H
+ 2 OH
aq aq 2 2
e + H· + H O H + OH
aq 2 2
H· + H· H 2
Most of these reactions remove chemi c ally reactive sp ecies from the system.
With time (by ~ 10 -6 sec) all of the reactive speci es have diffused sufficiently far that further reactions are unlikely.
The chemi c al development of the track is over by 10 -6 sec.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Radical Diffusion
If the m easured diffusion constant for a gi ven species is D, then, on average, it will move a s m all distance, λ , in a time, τ , such that
2
6 D
The reacti on radius, R, is a measure of the reactivity of the individual species. If a reactive speci es diffuses closer to a “target” than the reactive r a dius. It will react.
Simulati ons of Charged-Particle Tracks
The diffusion form ula and the recom b inat ion reactions described above allow Monte Carlo sim u lation of th e charged-particle tracks.
Monte Carlo codes are used to m odel:
passage of the charged particle,
generation of secondary electrons,
generation of chemi c ally reactive speci es,
diffusion of the reactive species through a series of “random walk” jum p s,
reco m b ination events in any pairs that come closer than the reactive r a dius.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Exampl es of T r ack Simulations
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
When the electron st ops, in the upper left re gion of t h e figure, the track density is higher.
This illustrates the hi gh-LET nature of the electron track end.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Exampl es of t r ack simulations
High-LET particle (prot on) produces a straight tr ack , in contrast to the torturous tracks of electrons .
High LET particles have a dense form ation of react ants along the particle track.
In the simulation, clusters and spurs are also generated along the track.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Examples of Simulated Particle Tracks
Expanded view of the high-L ET proton track.
Expanded scales show a close-up view of track developm ent as a function of tim e.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Radiochemical Yield: G values
In sim u lations, the num b ers of the various chemi c al species can be tabulated as a function of time.
G value : the num ber of a particular species produced per 100 ev of energy loss by the charged particle and its seconda ries when it stops in water.
Som e species will decrease with time, oth e rs will increase with time.
By about 10 -6 sec, al l chemi cal development of the track is over. G values will not change m u ch after that.
The alpha particle has 4 times higher LET.
LET decreases at higher energies, th e init ial density of react ants is lower, m o re survive without reco m b ining (lines 1-4), less produced (lines 4+5).
The alpha track is denser, the G values ar e lower, because more reco mbine.
Electrons, protons and alpha particles all produce t h e same s p ecies in t r ack regions (at 10 -15 sec), H 2 O * , H 2 O· + and e¯.
The chem ical (and biological) diffe rences later ar e d u e to the different spatial patterns of energy deposition along the track, ie., track density.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Effect of LET on G values
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
The F r icke Dosi meter
Originally developed as a dose-measur ing device. Strong LET dependence li m its this application.
Most useful as a method to di rectly m e asure the numbers of reactive species in solution.
The standard solution: 1 m M FeSO 4 in 0.8 N H 2 SO 4
When irradiated, the Fe 2+ is oxidiz e d to Fe 3+ .
Fe 3+ generates a blue color that can be quantified with a spectrophot ometer.
The colori metric dose response is linear up to 400 Gy.
The oxidation is complete at ~ 700 Gy.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
[Tubiana, 1990]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Fricke Dosimeters
The chemi cal r e actions involv ed in Fricke dosimetry are: H· + O 2 HO 2 ·
HO 2 · + Fe 2+ HO 2 ¯ + F e 3+
HO 2 ¯ + H + H 2 O 2
HO· + F e 2+ HO¯ + Fe 3+
H 2 O 2 + Fe 2+ HO¯ + Fe 3+ + HO·
H· + H 2 O HO· + H 2 (only in the absence of oxygen)
Each H· will produce 3 Fe 3+
Each H 2 O 2 (radiolytic) will produce 2 Fe 3+
Each HO· (radiolytic) will produce 1 Fe 3+ Overall, when O 2 is present,
G(Fe 3+ ) = 2 G(H 2 O 2 ) + 3 G(H·) + G(HO·)
What is the use of a Fricke Do simeter?
Dem onstrates that scave nger m o lecules will react, cell com ponents should react si milarly.
Can be used to test other com p eting scavengers.
Demonstrates that n o t all ener gy depos ition translates into scavengable species, i . e., at high LET ther e i s consid erable intratrack reco mbination.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Direct Acti on, I ndirect Acti on and the Oxygen Ef fect
So far, the radiation chem istry of water h a s been co nsidered.
It is possi ble that energy can be deposite d directly in the biologi cal m o lecule of interest (e.g., DNA).
The result would still be ionization a nd/or excitation leading to radical form ation in the biol ogical m o lecule.
Biological radicals can undergo reactions sim i l a r to those described for water.
Direct act i on : energy depositi on directly in the biological molecule ( e .g., the DNA as shown here). The dose response relationshi p shoul d be linear.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
Indirect a c tion: Relies on the ionization of the solvent m o lecules as interm ediaries. Indirect action is di ffusion lim ited, the dose response relationship can be com p lex.
Water radiolysis produces many reactive species.
Experiments with scavengers specific for individual reactive species have shown that it is prim arily the hydroxyl radical (HO · ) that is responsible for radiation dam a ge to DNA.
[Hall,2000]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
For high-LET radiation , direct action is the pre domin ant mechanis m o f DNA dam a ge.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
Radiation dam a ge in DNA can be repaired by several processes.
Recombination: reaction of nearby radical with the DNA radical to regenerate the original DNA. Tim e scale is < 10 -11 sec.
Restitution: chem ical restoration of the DNA; no enzy m e involved. There are a nu mber of intracellular reducing ag ents that can react with radicals, the m o st im portant of which is glutathi one (GSH). The sulfhydryl group on GSH can donate H· to the DNA, produc ing the restored DNA and a more stable (and less reactive ) sulfur radical. The ti me scale is < ~ 10 -3 sec.
DNA· + GSH DNA + GS·
Repair: there are many cellula r enzymes that recognize and repair DNA dam a ge. Tim e scale is m i nutes to hours.
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
“Fixation” of damage by oxygen
O 2 is a powerful oxi dizing agent. O 2 has two unpaired electrons: a stable biradical.
O 2 reacts r eadily wit h organic radicals:
DNA· + O 2 DNA-O-O· (DNA hydroperoxy radical) DNA - O-O· H· DNA- O-OH (DNA hydrope roxide)
If oxygen reacts with the DNA radical bef o re it is repaired, the damage
becom e s harder, if not im possible, to re pair. Cann o t be repai r ed by chemi cal restitution.
[Image removed due to copyright concerns]
[Hall, 2000]
2 2 .55 “Pri n c ip l e s of Rad i atio n In teraction s ”
Scavengers
Chem icals that can react with reac tive speci es, like HO· , can b l ock the indirect
effects of radiation.
Scavengers provi de a way to estim ate relative contributi ons of direct and indirect effects.
Scavenger s for specific reactive speci es can help define the radiation chem istry.
Scavenger experim e nts suggest that 60 - 70% of the damage in cells exposed to low-LET radiation is caused by HO · radicals.
Radical Scavenging
In order to sim p lify com p lex chem istry in soluti ons or cells, scavengers can be added to selectively react with one or mo re types of radicals.