The Econom ics of Reprocessing and M O X Recycle
A pril 5, 2004
Reprocessing
Image removed due to copyright considerations.
H anford W A - not in use
Image removed due to copyright considerations.
La H ague, France - in use
Estim ated S eparated P lutonium H oldings
Country Se |
parated civilian Pu (kg) |
Declared military Pu (kg)* |
Japan |
4,900 |
0 |
Germany |
6,600 |
0 |
Belgium |
3,800 |
0 |
Switzerland |
<50 |
0 |
France |
29,100 |
0 |
United States |
4,650 |
47,500 |
China |
0 |
0 |
United Kingdom |
69,100 |
4,400 |
Russia |
32,000 |
50,000 |
*Declared to be in excess of national security requirements
c
UO X (once-through ) cycle :
Ore
Enr
Fabri
c.
PWR
Interim
Storage
Disposal
Tails
Nat U
Spent
OT
fuel
Reproce
ss-ing
Pu
Fabri
.
PWR
Interim
Storage
MOX
Uranium credit
Disposal
HLW+IL W/LLW
Disposal
A ssum ptions
1. The contents of the spent fue l discharged fro m reactors operating on the UOX once-through cycle with a burnup of 50, 000 MWDth/MTIHM are as follows:
Uranium: 93.4 w/o (U 235 enrichment: 1.1 w/o)
Plutonium: 1.33 w/o (total fissile enrichment (Pu 239 +Pu 241 ) = 0.93 w/o) Fission products: 5.15 w/o
Minor a ctinides: 0.12 w/o
2. Fissile plutonium (Pu 239 +Pu 241 ) is approximately equivalent to U-235 on a gram fo r gram b asis; that is, equal weight pe rcent enrichments of U-235 and fissile plutonium in U-238 are needed to drive a fuel assembly to the same cycle and discharge burnups. (In practice, MOX fuel has a lower initial reactivity for the same weight percent fissile enrichment, but undergoes a slower loss of reactivity with burnup.)
3. Value of uranium recovered from reprocessing spent PWR fuel is zero. (The recovered uranium is still slightly enriched in U-235, but other U isotopes make it less attractive, and u nder current market conditions, with low natural uranium prices, it is not economic to reuse it.)
M O X Fuel C ycle C ost Param eters
Transaction |
Uni t Cost |
Lea d Time (to start of |
MOX fuel loading) |
||
Credit for elimination of |
$500/kg HM |
2 years |
SF interim storage and |
||
disposal cost |
||
Reprocessing |
$400 - $1600/kg HM |
2 years |
Uranium credit |
0 |
-- |
HLW/ILW/LLW s torage |
$200-400/kg HM in SF |
1 year |
and final disposal cost |
||
Natural uranium ore |
$40/kg HM |
1 year |
purchase and yellowcake |
||
conversion |
||
Blending + MOX fuel |
$1500/kg HM |
1 year |
fabrication |
||
Interim storage of spent |
$100/kg HM |
At discharge |
MOX fuel |
||
Final disposal of spent |
$400/kg HM |
At discharge |
MOX fuel
Note : Duration of irradiation = 4.5 years.
Material balance
Q: How many kilograms of spent PWR fuel must be reprocessed and natural U purchased to produce 1 kg of MOX fuel at 4.51% fissile enrichment?
Let W be the mass of spent fuel (in kg/kg of MOX fuel)
Let M be the mass of natural uranium (in kg/kg of MOX fuel) Let x be the en richment of fissile Pu in the MOX fuel
Let y be the en richment of U-235 in the MOX fuel
M kg natural uranium
MOX
Fabrication
0.711 w/o U-235
Spen t fuel W kg HM
z kg fissile Pu
Reprocessing
fissile Pu
1% loss 1% loss
of HM of HM
1 kg HM (as MOX)
x kg fissile Pu
y kg U-235
M aterial B alance: Front-end of M O X cycle
M kg natural uranium
MOX
Fabrication
z kg fissile Pu
R eprocessing
0.711 w/o U-235
Spen t fuel W kg HM
1.01 z kg fissile Pu
1% loss 1% loss
1 kg HM (as MOX)
x kg fissile Pu
y kg U-235
Calculation of M O X Fuel C ycle C ost
Total batch cost M i C i M i C i T i
i i
Transaction |
Unit Cost, C i ($/kg) † |
Mass Flow, M I (kg) |
T I (years) |
Direct Cost, M I C I ($/kg) |
Carrying Charge, M I C I T I ( - 0.1/yr) |
SF Storage |
400 |
4.2 |
4.25 |
-2100 |
-893 |
Disposal Credit |
|||||
Reprocessing |
1000 |
4.2 |
4.25 |
4200 |
1785 |
HL/IL/LL Waste |
300 |
4.2 |
3.25 |
1260 |
410 |
Disposal |
|||||
U purchase + |
40 |
0.97 |
3.25 |
39 |
11.7 |
conversion |
|||||
MOX fab |
1500 |
1.01 |
3.25 |
1515 |
492 |
Interim storage |
500 |
1.0 |
-2.25 |
500 |
-113 |
and disposal of |
|||||
MOX fuel |
|||||
TOTAL |
5414 |
1692.7 |
GRAND TOTAL $7107/kg HM MOX fuel
i.e. , MOX fuel cycle c ost ~ 3 x once through cycle cost
Qu estio ns
1. What is the minimum price of natural uranium ore at which MOX recycle would be economic? 2.
3. What is the maximum cost of reprocessing at which MOX recycle w ould be economic? 4.
5. Why are countries such as France and Japan pu rsuing MOX recycle?
Breakeven uranium price as a function of reprocessing cost
1400
1200
Breakeven uranium price ($/kg U)
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Reprocessing cost ($/kg HM)
N atural U ranium Price Trends
Source: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and IAEA, Uranium 2001: Resources, Production and Demand, 2002, p. 68.