1.021 , 3.021, 10.333, 22.00 : Introduction to Modeling and Simulation : Spring 2012 Part II – Quantum Mechanical Methods : Lecture 10
Solar PV
Jeffrey C. Grossman
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Massac husetts Institute of T ec hnology
Par t II T opics
1. It ’ s a Quantum W orld: The Theor y of Quantum Mechanics
2. Quantum Mechanics: Practice Mak es P erf ect
3. Fr om Man y-Body to Single-Par ticle; Quantum Modeling of Molecules
4. Application of Quantum Modeling of Molecules: Solar Thermal Fuels
5. Application of Quantum Modeling of Molecules: Hydr ogen Storage
6. Fr om Atoms to Solids
7. Quantum Modeling of Solids: Basic Pr oper ties
8. Advanced Pr op . of Materials: What else can w e do?
9.
Application of Quantum Modeling of Solids: Solar Cells Par t I
10. Application of Quantum Modeling of Solids: Solar Cells Par t II
11. Application of Quantum Modeling of Solids: Nanotechnolog y
Summar y
• A bit of discussion of PSET 6
• Solar PV - Mor e Motivation
• Solar PV - the vie wpoint of the elect r on!
• Ho w computational quantum mechanics can impact solar PV
Energ y f r om the Sun
Courtesy of SOHO/EIT (ESA & NASA) consortium.
• Energ y r eleased b y an ear thqua k e of magnitude 8 (10 17 J):
• the sun deliv ers this in one second
• Energ y humans use ann uall y (10 20 J):
• sun deliv ers this in one hour
• Ear th ’ s total r esour ces of oil (3 trillion bar r els, 10 22 J):
• the sun deliv ers this in tw o d a ys
Time Magazine , 3 Apr il 2006
© Time Magazine. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
Cost of Inaction?
Image by Dr. Pieter Tans, NOAA/ESRL and Dr. Ralph Keeling, Scripps Institute of Oceanography .
Grinnel Glacier: 1910 photo by Fred Kiser (top); 1997 photo by Dan Fagre (bottom). Courtesy of GNP archives.
W arming is Real and Has Real Eff ects
MODIS images from NASA's Terra satellite courtesy of Ted Scambos, National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Betw een Jan 31, 2002
Ja n 3 1
Fe b 1 7
Fe b 2 3
Mar 5
and Mar ch 5, 2002 a chunk of the Larsen B ice shelf the size of Rhode Island disintegrated.
Images fr om NASA's T er ra satellite , National Sno w and Ice Data Cente r , Univ ersity of Colorad o , Boulde r .
Sur v e ys sho w the mountain pine beetle has inf ested 21 million acr es and killed 411 million cubic f eet of tr ees -- double the ann ual ta k e b y all the loggers in Canada. In se v en y ears or soone r , the F or est Ser vice pr edicts, that kill will nearl y triple and 80 pe r cent of the pines in the central British Columbia f or est will be dead. The W ashington Post, Mar ch 1, 2006
Photo by Leo Rankin/British Columbia Forest Service. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
CO 2 P r ojections
Source: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of W orking Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change .
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Figure 10.22 (b). Cambridge University Press.
The seesa w pattern that rides the rising CO2 tr end r esults fr om the ann ual “br eathing” of the ear th.
Natur e “bor r o w[s] CO2 f or plant gr o wth during the summer and r eturn[s] the loan each succeeding winte r . ” – Da vid K eeling
Recent w orld e v ents that slo w ed oil p r oduction
Image by Dr. Pieter Tans, NOAA/ESRL and Dr. Ralph Keeling, Scripps Institute of Oceanography .
Science 310, 1313 (2005)
T emperatur e inf er r ed f r om isotope ratios in the V ostok ice cor e
Carbon dio xide le v els measur ed in the tra pped air bubbles in the same cor e
CO 2 twice as high as it has e v er been in 400,000 YEARS
Photo by Lonnie Thompson, Courtesy of Ohio State University. All rights reserved.
fr om Thin Ice b y Mark Bo w en
© source unknown. All rights reserved.
Copyrighted material on this page is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair- use/ .
“I can get eight p r of essors f r om MIT on both sides of this issue and no one in this r oom will walk a w a y understanding what the y said about climate change . ”
□ Charlie Ba k e r , F ormer Candidate f or Massachusetts Go v ernor
© unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
If warming exceeds 2°C , negativ e eff ects incr ease and catast r ophic changes become mor e li k el y
Courtesy of Hal Harvey. Used with permission.
Cour tesy: Hal Har v e y (Climate W orks)
Abundance of Solar Energ y
A v erage solar po w er incident on Ear th ~ 130,000 TW
Global energ y consumption (2001) ~ 13.5 TW Source: DOE
24%
23%
ENERGY SOURCES
6.7% P etr oleum
Natural Gas
6.5%
Coal Hydr oelectricity
39%
0.75% Nuclear
Solar/Wind/ W ood/ W aste
If ~2% of the continental United States is co v er ed with PV systems with a net efficiency of 10% w e w ould be able to suppl y all the US energ y needs (0.3% land co v erage to meet just electricity needs)
(Land ar ea r equir ement is comparable to ar ea occupied b y interstate highwa ys)
Note: 40% of our land is allocated to p r oducing f ood
Nuclear po w er equivalent is 3,300 x 1 GW n uclear po w er plants. (1 f or e v er y 10 miles of coastline or major waterw a y)
Solar Across Scales
Moscone Center: 675,000 W
Residential home: 2400 W
Kenyan PV market: A verage system: 18W
Moscone Center © SunPower/PowerLight Corp. Image of residential roof and Kenyan woman with panel © unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
Solar Land A r ea Requi r ements
150 Km 2 solar panels in Ne vada w ould po w er the U .S. (15% efficient)
J.A. T urne r , Science 285
1999, p . 687.
Image by the United States Geological Survey is in the public domain.
Solar Land A r ea Requi r ements f or ~20TW
At a price (today) of $350/m 2
this would cost $50 trillion!
Image by Matthias Loster on Wikimedia Commons. License: CC-BY.
Solar PV: Grid Parity
Source: Mckinsey
Lorenz, P., D. Pinner, and T. Seitz. "The Economics of Solar Power." Energy, Resources, Materials: McKinsey & Company, June 2008. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
14¢
Aim: capture 10% of electrical generation with PV
Side note: replacing fossil fuels in the de v e loping w or ld wi l l b eco me mu ch more important in the near future.
At 14¢ per kW e h , P V co uld co st-ef f ectiv ely r eplace 10% of electrical energy used in U.S.
No storage needed.
Co uld be deplo yed by 2022, with 0.04% land use.
SOLAR INTENSIT Y :
HO W MUCH AREA IS REQUIRED T O GENER A TE PO WER?
air mass 1 atmosphere
sun Satellite
air mass 1.5
earth
sun
Sola r spectru m outsid e atmosphere: air mass 0 (AM0) 1353 W/m 2
A t earth’ s surface:
sun at z e nith:
air mass 1 (AM1) 925 W/m 2
sun at 45°:
air mass 1.5 (AM1.5) 844 W/m 2
AM1.5 is terrestrial solar cell standard
Comparison of PV Technologies
We a r e h e r e , e . g . ,
• amorphous silicon
• polymers
• all-carbon
• quantum dots
This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons .
Solar PV technolog y landsca pe (2015)
• Cost/efficiency tradeoff:
• high efficiency modules module efficiency:
h a v e lo w er installation costs
• lo w efficiency modules
Insta llation cost {$/W}
h a v e lo w er module costs
7% 9.1%
12.2% 13.2%
15.4%
2.6
2.2
C ost sa v in gs
1.8
1.4
8
12
16
20
Module eff iciency {%}
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
© source unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse .
10 5
14,000 acres/da y
10 4
100% US
10 3
10% US
10 2
10
1
0.1
14 a cres/da y
2000
2010
2020
Y ear
2030
2040
Expected Global Solar Cell Pro duction.
After Mike Ro gol.
Annual PV production in GW
Ho w do w e suppl y 81 kWh/d a y/ person of solar electricity?
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
2006: Solar Cell Production Rate: 14 acres / day
2035: Requir ed Solar Cell Pr oduction Rate: 14,000 acr es / da y
T o survive, any new technology needs to:
- ACCELERE A TE OVER THE Si-PRODUCTION
- REACH HIGHER EFFICIENCIES and/or LOWER INS T ALL A TION COSTS
PN Ju n cti o n ( b ri ef revi ew)
Equilibrium in a p-n junction is still “dynamic” and there are four kinds of currents contributing to the net zero flow of charge.
(1) Majority Hole Current. Dif fusional current from hole movement from p to n (current from p to n). (2) Minority Hole Current. Drift current from holes moving from n to p, assisted by the electric field
(current from n to p).
(3) Majority Electron Current. Electron dif fusion from n to p from the high concentration gradient (current from p to n).
(4) Minority Electron Current. Electron drift from p to n, assisted by the electric field (current from n to p). In reverse bias (V < 0), the current comes from minority carriers and is due to drift. In forward bias (V > 0), the current arises from majority carriers and is due to dif fusion.
PN Ju n cti o n ( b ri ef revi ew)
The presence of light induces a net positive change in the generation–recombination rate. Roughly speaking, for each type of current, the ef fect of light is:
(1) Majority Hole Current. Relatively unaf fected, if generation occurs evenly on both sides.
(2) Minority Hole Current. Increased, due to the additional carriers now present. The additional carriers resulting from illumination are immediately transferred across the junction in the form of a drift current.
(3) Majority Electron Current. Relatively unaf fected.
(4) Minority Electron Current. Increased, due to the additional carriers now present.
Ef fectivel y , under illumination, the IV characteristic of the PN junction is shifted downwards, by an amount that is directly determined from the photocurrent incident upon the junction.
Photo-excitation Relaxation
CBM
E f Extraction
T ransport
Extraction
E f
T ransport
Recombination
VBM
Fundamental P r ocesses In v ol v ed in Solar Photo v oltaics: Elect r on ’ s Vie w
External Load
The Role of Computational Quantum Mechanics
• What do w e kno w ho w to compute?
?
• Ho w does it help f or solar PV?
?
electrical
pr oper ties
mec hanical
pr oper ties
Images of solar panel and strips © sources unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
?
optical
pr oper ties
?
Cr ystalline Silicon Solar PV (80% of cur r ent mar k et)
• Light Absorption
• Band Ga p
• Band Structur e
• Elect r on/Hole T ranspor t
© Helmut Föll. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse .
• Elect r on/Hole Mobilities
σ = e 2 τ ∫
d k
4 π 3
— ∂ f v ( k ) v ( k )
∂ E
Amorphous Silicon Solar PV (3% of cur r ent mar k et)
• Light Absorption (is actuall y pr etty g ood)
• Elect r on-Hole Separation (also not a p r oblem)
• Elect r on/Hole T ranspor t (Holes ar e Slo w!)
• Hole Mobilities
• Hole T ra ps: f r om total energ y diff er ences (E neutral -E charged )
Organic Solar PV
• Light Absorption (need to ca ptur e mor e of the solar spectrum)
• Band ga p
• Elect r on-Hole Separation
© source unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative
Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair- use/ .
• Orbital energies
P ol y(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT): E g,exp = 2.1 eV Lo w-energ y photons ar e not absorbed!
R
R
Ega p = Eo Ega p = 0.55Eo Ega p = 1.1Eo
D y e Sensitized Solar PV
Gratzel and O’Regan (Natur e , 1991)
Made up of 3 activ e materials:
• Dy e absorbs light.
• TiO 2 nanopar ticles with v er y
large surface ar ea ta k e electr on.
• Liquid electr ol yte deliv ers ne w electr on fr om cathode to dy e .
Image in the public domain. Via M. R. Jones on Wikimedia Commons .
D y e Sensitized Solar PV
• Biggest p r oblem is a
liquid elect r ol yte .
• Relativ e energ y le v els
of TiO2 and dy e also k e y .
© source unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/ .
Summar y
• Energ y is a Major Global Challenge
• The Sun has a Lot of it F or Fr ee but it ’ s T oo Expensiv e to Utilize
• Computational Quantum Mechanics can Help us Understand and Pr edict
PV Ne w Materials
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu
3.021 J / 1.021J / 10.333J / 18.361J / 22.00J Introduction to Modelling and Simulation
Spring 2012
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms .